Local back­up vs. tarsnap

A lot of peo­ple do not do back­ups at home. Unfor­tu­nate­ly this includes me. So far I was lucky that noth­ing bad hap­pened (or that I was able to get back all via manip­u­lat­ing on-disk-data by hand). For me this is most­ly because of the price and com­plex­i­ty (num­ber of back­up media involved) for local back­ups. It also means that I only need a back­up for the case of a disk-crash, not because I need to recov­er a file because I acci­dent­ly delet­ed it (yes, I am very good at not loos­ing data at home… maybe this is also the rea­son why I have so much data).

I have about 1 TB of raw disk space at home (two times raidz1). Not all of this needs a back­up (or is used at all), for exam­ple the base sys­tem files, /usr/local, the ports dis­t­files and pack­ages all do not need a back­up, but my cam­era fotos (cur­rent­ly 8 GB) should be includ­ed in a back­up, my home should be includ­ed in a back­up, my local stag­ing area for the con­tent of my web­serv­er should be includ­ed in a back­up, my mails (cur­rent­ly 800 MB) should be includ­ed in the back­up, local patch­es to FreeB­SD should be includ­ed in the back­up, …

So let us cal­cu­late with about 200 GB of more (mails, fotos, pri­vate videos) or less (MP3s from my own CDs) impor­tant data for a full back­up. Most of it will not change often (MP3s, pri­vate videos, fotos), so once a month should be ok, and some (e.g. my mails) change dai­ly, so an incre­men­tal each day and a full once a week would be inter­est­ing for me. When I do such a back­up, I do not want to shuf­fle around tapes a lot. Maybe one or two times (s0 2 – 3 tapes) would be ok. So I am talk­ing about 80 – 200 GB per tape. The prices for this range from 700 EUR to 1300 EUR just for the tape dri­ve. I have also seen a tape dri­ve from Iomega for about 400 EUR (120 GB per tape), but some­how this sounds like a not so trust­worty solu­tion to me (I do not know why, it is just a feel­ing, maybe I am a lit­tle bit biased because of the high-end solu­tion at work, if some­one knows more about those Iomega dri­ves and tapes in a long term or high-useage envi­ron­ment, please write a com­ment).

When I take the cur­rent price of tarsnap into account, I come to about $60 per month for the stor­age, and again $60 for the ini­tial trans­fer of 200 GB. This assumes the 200 GB are not very com­press­able. With each incre­men­tal back­up (changed files mat­ter, not a diff between the files), I assume about 10 GB per month of change (= $3 per month). Yes, this is most prob­a­bly too much, but I try to cal­cu­late a worst case sce­nario. So this sums up to $60 once and $63 per month. I do not take into account my too slow upstream band­with. When I assume a 1500 EUR tape dri­ve plus tapes plus clean­ing car­tridge, we are talk­ing about some­thing like 2 – 3 years of stor­ing the back­up in tarsnap (with the Iomega dri­ve this would be just one year).

When I assume that I over­es­ti­mat­ed every­thing with a fac­tor of 2, this means 5 – 6 years of using tarsnap vs. buy­ing an expen­sive tape dri­ve. Now the ques­tion is, will the tape dri­ve sur­vive this long, will I be able to use such a dri­ve in new hard­ware  in 6 years, will tarsnap sur­vive this long, and will it stay at the same or bet­ter price lev­el (this is also influ­enced by the price of the stor­age provider).

Anoth­er solu­tion would be to go with a mixed set­ting, e.g. an 1 TB hard-disk (less than 150 EUR  for the hard-disk (with 7 years war­ran­ty) and an exter­nal case) to do the long term stor­age of high-volume but long-term-stable stuff (fotos, videos, music), and use tarsnap for the low-volume fast chang­ing stuff (con­fig files, mails). This way the amount of mon­ey for the real­ly impor­tant things is not much, I would expect less than 1 GB com­pressed (= less than an EUR per month). This also sounds like a solu­tion which allows me to be lazy (the impor­tant stuff can be auto­mat­ed, the nice to have stuff can be done from time to time as need­ed).

I think I should ask Collin if he has a way to receive SWIFT (IBAN/BIC) trans­fers for tarsnap…

Send to Kin­dle

Some com­pa­nies do not want to get mon­ey…

The rea­son for our prob­lems with the phone @Work (see relat­ed posts) is known now. The com­pa­ny pay­ing for the phone lines changed the tax num­ber (fall­out of a require­ment to make busi­ness with banks here), informed the 2 phone com­pa­nies they are using about it, got a bill from one with the old tax num­ber and from the oth­er one with the cor­rect tax num­ber, informed the phone com­pa­ny which used the old num­ber again, got again a bill with the wrong tax num­ber, informed them again, … until the phone com­pa­ny cut the line (pay­ing the bill while there is the wrong tax num­ber on it seems to cause big prob­lems lat­er in the tax/mon­ey han­dling chain).

So there a sev­er­al kinds of phone com­pa­nies here. Those which want to make busi­ness with cus­tomers (e.g. Ver­i­zon in LU), and those which do not (e.g. P&T in LU).

Let us wait and see when we get work­ing phone lines and from whom… 🙂

Send to Kin­dle

No phone @Work since a week…

Since a week we (7−10 peo­ple) can not make or receive phone calls with the phones at work. Luck­i­ly this is only the remote-half of the team which works for this client, the onsite peo­ple do not have this prob­lem.

As bad as this is from the client-relations side of view, I have to say this makes it qui­et and relax­ing here ATM… We get requests via EMail or our ticket-system (or a cowork­er pro­vides some info on the mobiles) and we can han­dle them with­out much dis­tur­bance.

Before you think bad about the com­pa­ny I work for… we are just a sub­con­trac­tor, the phone lines are not han­dled by us (but I was told that the issue is now looked at by the big boss).

The run­ning gag of the week is mak­ing the error-noise of the phone.

Send to Kin­dle

On the way to solve the CUPS prob­lem

I opened a bug report for the prob­lem (have a look at the relat­ed posts below) and got the response that it is a prob­lem in pstoraster. This means it is a prob­lem in ghost­script, not in CUPS.

So I had a look at pstoraster and seen that CUPS_FONTPATH is added to GS_LIB. The­o­ret­i­cal­ly it should solve my issue when I set CUPS_FONTPATH, but this assumes I can do it with­out CUPS dis­card­ing my set­tings.

Unfor­tu­nate­ly this assump­tion is not true. I tried it and I still see the same behav­ior as before.

Send to Kin­dle

Rea­son for the env pass­ing prob­lem in CUPS

Today I had the time to have a look at the prob­lem I have to pass the val­ue of the GD_LIB vari­able from CUPS to ghost­script: CUPS is set­ting this vari­able on its own and thus over­rid­ing my set­ting. 🙁

It seems CUPS is not check­ing if I have my own GS_LIB vari­able and adding its own path to the already set one. That is bad.

Send to Kin­dle