Alexander Leidinger

Just another weblog

Feb
03

What you should know about SSH

Michael W. Lucas pub­lished his new book “SSH Mas­tery” (no link to an online store, get it from your pre­ferred online or offline one in your part of the world).

Do you think you know a lot about SSH? I thought I did when Michael searched tech­ni­cal proof-readers for this book. I offered to have a look at his work in progress and he gen­tly accepted (while I do not get money for this, I am one of the per­sons he thanks for  the tech­ni­cal review in the begin­ning, so I am involved some­how and as such you should take the fol­low­ing with a grain of salt).

I already had user restric­tions in place before the review, but now I nar­rowed down some restric­tions based upon some con­di­tion­als. I already used SSH tun­nels for var­i­ous things before (where legally applic­a­ble), but I learned some addi­tional VPN tech­niques with SSH. I already used mul­ti­ple ssh-keys for var­i­ous things, but Michael pro­vides some inter­est­ing ways of han­dling a large-volume of ssh-keys over mul­ti­ple machines. … I really hope that my review was as valu­able for Michael, as it was for me to do the review.

He ends the book with “You now know more about SSH, OpenSSH and Putty than the vast major­ity of IT pro­fes­sion­als! Con­grat­u­la­tions”, and this is true, and all that in his writ­ing style where you can come with a prob­lem, read about it, and leave with a solu­tion (nor­mally with a lit­tle bit of enter­tain­ment in between).

I know a lot of peo­ple which work daily with SSH, and they know only a small part of what is pre­sented in this book. In my opin­ion this book is a must-have for every System/Database/Application/Whatever Admin­is­tra­tor in charge of some­thing on an UNIX-like sys­tem, and even “nor­mal users” of SSH (no mat­ter if they use PuTTY, or a ssh com­mand line pro­gram on an UNIX-like sys­tem (most prob­a­bly it will be OpenSSH or a clone of it)) will get some help­ful infor­ma­tion from this book.

I can only rec­om­mend it.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
Share/Save

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Dec
22

Tun­ing guide in the wiki

In the light of the recent bench­mark dis­cus­sion, a vol­un­teer imported the tun­ing man-page into the wiki. Some com­ments at some places for pos­si­ble improve­ments are already made. Please go over there, have a look, and par­tic­i­pate please (testing/verification/discussion/improvements/…).

As always, feel free to reg­is­ter with First­name­Last­name and tell a FreeBSD com­mit­ter to add you to the con­trib­u­tors group for write access (you also get the ben­e­fit to be able to reg­is­ter for an email noti­fi­ca­tion for spe­cific pages).

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

Tags: , , , , , , ,
Sep
21

Speed traps with chmod

I have the habit to chmod with the rel­a­tive nota­tion (e.g. g+w or a+r or go-w or sim­i­lar) instead of the absolute one (e.g. 0640 or u=rw,g=r,o=). Recently I had to chmod a lot of files. As usual I was using the rel­a­tive nota­tion. With a lot of files, this took a lot of time. Time was not really an issue, so I did not stop it to restart with a bet­ter per­form­ing com­mand (e.g. find /path –type f –print0 | xargs –0 chmod 0644; find /path –type d –print0 | xargs –0 chmod 0755), but I thought a lit­tle tips&tricks post­ing may be in order, as not every­one knows the difference.

The rel­a­tive notation

When you spec­ify g+w, it means to remove the write access for the group, but keep every­thing else like it is. Nat­u­rally this means that chmod first has to lookup the cur­rent access rights. So for each async write request, there has to be a read-request first.

The absolute notation

The absolute nota­tion is what most peo­ple are used to (at least the numeric one). It does not need to read the access rights before chang­ing them, so there is less I/O to be done to get what you want. The draw­back is that it is not so nice for recur­sive changes. You do not want to have the x-bit for data files, but you need it for direc­to­ries. If you only have a tree with data files where you want to have an uni­form access, the exam­ple above via find is prob­a­bly faster (for sure if the direc­tory meta-data is still in RAM).

If you have a mix of bina­ries and data, it is a lit­tle bit more tricky to come up with a way which is faster. If the data has a name-pattern, you could use it in the find.

And if you have a non-uniform access for the group bits and want to make sure the owner has write access to every­thing, it may be faster to use the rel­a­tive nota­tion than to find a replace­ment command-sequence with the absolute notation.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Sep
01

HOWTO add linux-infrastructure ports for a new linux_base port

In my last blog-post I described how to cre­ate a new linux_base port. This blog-post is about the other Linux–ports which make up the Linux–infra­struc­ture in the FreeBSD Ports Col­lec­tion for a given Linux-release.

What are linux-infrastructure ports?

A linux_base port con­tains as much as pos­si­ble and at the same time as lit­tle as pos­si­ble to make up a use­ful Linux-compatibility-experience in FreeBSD. I know, this is not a descrip­tive expla­na­tion. And it is not on pur­pose. There are no fixed rules what has to be inside or what not. It “matured” into the cur­rent shape. A prac­ti­cal exam­ple is, that there is no GUIstuff in the linux_base. While you need the GUI parts like GTK or QT for soft­ware like Skype and acroread, you do not need them for head­less game servers. While you may need var­i­ous libraries for game servers, you may not need those for Skype or acroread. As such some stan­dard parts are in sep­a­rate ports which are named linux–LINUX_DIST_SUFFIX-NAME. For GTK and the Fedora 10 release this results in linux-f10-gtk2. Such generic ports which depend upon a spe­cific Linux-release make up the Linux-infrastructure in the FreeBSD Ports Col­lec­tion. Those ports are ref­er­enced in port-Makefiles via the USE_LINUX_APPS vari­able, e.g. USE_LINUX_APPS=gtk2.

If you cre­ated a new linux_base port, you need most stan­dard infra­struc­ture ports in a ver­sion for the Linux-release used in the linux_base port, to have the Linux-application ports in the FreeBSD Ports Col­lec­tion work­ing (if you are unlucky, some ports do not play well with the Linux-release you have cho­sen, but this is out of the scope of this HOWTO).

Updat­ing Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk

 First we need to set the LINUX_DIST_SUFFIX vari­able to a value suit­able to the new Linux-release. This is done in the con­di­tional which checks the OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS vari­able for valid val­ues. Add an appro­pri­ate con­di­tional, and do not for­get to add the new valid value to the IGNORE line in the last else branch of the conditional.

The next step is to check the _LINUX_APPS_ALL and _LINUX_26_APPS vari­ables. If there are some infra­struc­ture ports which are not avail­able for the new Linux-release, the con­di­tional which checks the avail­abil­ity of a given infra­struc­ture port for a given Linux-release needs to be mod­i­fied. If at a later step you notice that there are some addi­tional infra­struc­ture ports nec­es­sary for the new Linux-release, _LINUX_APPS_ALL and the check-logic needs to be mod­i­fied too (e.g. add a new vari­able for your Linux-release, add the con­tent of the vari­able to _LINUX_APPS_ALL, and change the check to do the right thing).

After that two tedious parts need to be done.

For each infra­struc­ture port there is a set of vari­ables. The name_PORT vari­able con­tains the loca­tion of the port in the Ports Col­lec­tion. Typ­i­cally you do not have to change it (if you really want to change it, do not do it, fix the nam­ing of the infra­struc­ture port instead), because we use a nam­ing con­ven­tion here which includes the LINUX_DIST_SUFFIX. The name_DETECT vari­able is an inter­nal vari­able, do not change it (if you cre­ate a new infra­struc­ture port, copy it from some­where else and make sure the name in value of the vari­able matches the port name in the name of the vari­able). Then there are sev­eral name_suf­fix_FILE vari­ables. Leave the exist­ing ones alone, and add a new one with the cor­rect suf­fix for your new Linux-release. The value of the vari­able needs to be an impor­tant file which is installed by the infra­struc­ture port in ques­tion. FYI: The con­tent of the name_suf­fix_FILE vari­ables are used to set the name_DETECT vari­ables, depend­ing on the Linux-relase the name_DETECT vari­ables are used to check if the port is already installed. Ide­ally the name_suf­fix_FILE vari­able points to a library in the port. The name_DEPENDS vari­able lists depen­den­cies of this infra­struc­ture port. If the depen­den­cies changed in your Linux-release, you need to add a con­di­tional to change the depen­dency if LINUX_DIST_SUFFIX is set to your Linux-release.

Nor­mally this is all what needs to be done in PORTSDIR/Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk, the rest of the file is code to check depen­den­cies and some cor­rect­ness checks.

The sec­ond tedious part is to actu­ally cre­ate all those infra­struc­ture ports. Nor­mally you can copy an exist­ing infra­struc­ture port, rename it, adjust the PORTNAME, PORTVERSION, PORTREVISION, MASTER_SITES, PKGNAMEPREFIX, DISTFILES, CONFLICTS (also in all other Linux-release ver­sions of this infra­struc­ture port), LINUX_DIST_VER, RPMVERSION (if set/neccesary) and SRC_DISTFILE vari­ables, gen­er­ate the dis­t­file check­sums (make make­sum), and fix the plist. I sug­gest to script parts of this work (as of this writ­ing Fresh­ports counts 68 ports where the port­name starts with linux-f10-).

Adding new infra­struc­ture ports, or remov­ing infra­struc­ture ports for a given Linux-release

If your Linux-release does not come with a pack­age for an exist­ing infra­struc­ture port, just do not cre­ate a cor­re­spond­ing name_suf­fix_FILE line. You still need to do the right thing regard­ing depen­den­cies of ports which depend upon this non-existing infra­struc­ture port (if your Linux-release comes with pack­ages for them).

To add a new infra­struc­ture port, copy an exist­ing block, rename the vari­ables, set them cor­rectly, add a new vari­able for your Linux-release in the first _LINUX_APPS_ALL sec­tion, add the con­tent of this vari­able to _LINUX_APPS_ALL, and change the check-logic as described above.

Final words

If you have some­thing which installs and dein­stalls cor­rectly, feel free to pro­vide it on freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org for review/testing. If you have ques­tions dur­ing the port­ing, feel also free to send a mail there.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Aug
29

HOWTO cre­ate a new linux_base port

FreeBSD is in need of a new linux_base port. It is on my TODO list since a long time, but I do not get the time to cre­ate one. I still do not have the time to work on a new one, but when you read this, I man­aged to get the time to cre­ate a HOWTO which describes what needs to be done to cre­ate a new linux_base port.

I will not describe how to cre­ate a new linux_base port from scratch, I will just describe how you can copy the last one and update it to some­thing newer based upon the exist­ing infra­struc­ture for RPM packages.

Spe­cific ques­tions which come up dur­ing port­ing a new Linux release should be asked on freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org,  there are more peo­ple which can answer ques­tions than here in my blog. I will add use­ful infor­ma­tion to this HOWTO if necessary.

In the easy case most of the work is search­ing the right RPMs and their depen­den­cies to use, and to cre­ate the plist.

Why do we need a new linux_base port?

The cur­rent linux_base port is based upon Fedora 10, which is end of life since Decem­ber 2009. Even Fedora 13 is already end of life. Fedora 16 is sup­posed to be released this year. From a sup­port point of view, Fedora 15 or maybe even Fedora 16 would be a good tar­get for the next linux_base port. Other alter­na­tives would be to use an extended life­time release of another RPM based dis­tri­b­u­tion, like for exam­ple Cen­tOS 6 (which seems to be based upon Fedora 12 with back­ports from Fedora 13 and 14). Using a Linux release which is told to be sup­ported for at least 10 years, sounds nice from a FreeBSD point of view (only minor changes to the linux ports in such a case, instead of cre­at­ing a com­plete new linux_base each N+2 releases like with Fedora), but it also means addi­tional work if you want to cre­ate the first linux_base port for it.

The mys­ter­ies you have to con­quer if you want to cre­ate a new linux_base port

What we do not know is, if Fedora 15/16, Cen­tOS 6, or any other Linux release will work in a sup­ported FreeBSD release. There are two ways to find this out.

The first one is to take an exist­ing Linux sys­tem, chroot into it (either via NFS or after mak­ing a copy into a direc­tory of a FreeBSD sys­tem), and to run a lot of pro­grams (acroread, skype, shells, scripts, …). The LTP test­suite is not that much use­ful here, as it will test mostly ker­nel fea­tures, but we do not know which ker­nel fea­tures are manda­tory for a given user­land of a Linux release.

The sec­ond way of test­ing if a given Linux release works on FreeBSD is to actu­ally cre­ate a new linux_base port for it and test it with­out chrooting.

The first way is faster, if you are only inter­ested in test­ing if some­thing works. The sec­ond way pro­vides an easy to setup test­bed for FreeBSD ker­nel devel­op­ers to fix the Lin­ux­u­la­tor so that it works with the new linux_base port. Both ways have their mer­its, but it is up to the per­son doing the work to decide which way to go.

The meat: HOWTO cre­ate a new linux_base port

First off, you need a sys­tem (or a jail) with­out any linux_base port installed. After that you can cre­ate a new linux_base port (= lbN), by just mak­ing a copy of the lat­est one (= lbO). In lbN you need to add lbO as a CONFLICT, and in all other exist­ing linux_base ports, you need to add lbN as a conflict.

Change the PORTNAME, PORTVERSION, reset the PORTREVISION in lbN, and set LINUX_DIST_VER  to the new Linux-release ver­sion in the lbN Make­file (this is used in PORTSDIR/Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk and PORTSDIR/Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk).

If you do not stay with Fedora, there is some more work to do before you can have a look at chos­ing RPMs for instal­la­tion. You need to have a look at PORTSDIR/Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk and add some cases for the new LINUX_DIST you want to use. Do not for­get to set LINUX_DIST in the lbN Make­file to the name of the dis­tri­b­u­tion you use. You also need to aug­ment the LINUX_DIST_VER check in PORTSDIR/Mk/bsd.linux-rpm.mk with some LINUX_DIST con­di­tion­als. If you are lucky, the direc­tory struc­ture for down­loads is sim­i­lar to the Fedora struc­ture, and there is not a lot to do here.

When this is done, you can have a look at the BIN_DISTFILES vari­able in the lbN Make­file. Try to find sim­i­lar RPMs for the new Linux release you want to port. Some may not be avail­able, and it may also be the case that dif­fer­ent ones are needed instead. I sug­gest to first work with the ones which are avail­able (make make­sum, test install and cre­ate plist). After that you need to find out what the replace­ment RPMs for non-existing ones are. You are on your own here. Search around the net, and/or have a look at the depen­den­cies in the RPMs of lbO to deter­mine if some­thing was added as a depen­dency of some­thing else or not (if not, for­get about it ATM). When you man­aged to find replace­ment RPMs, you can now have a look at the depen­den­cies of the RPMs in lbN. Do not add blindly all depen­den­cies, not all are needed in FreeBSD (the linux_base ports are not sup­posed to cre­ate an envi­ron­ment which you can chroot into, they are sup­posed to aug­ment the FreeBSD sys­tem to be able to run Linux pro­grams in ports like they where FreeBSD native pro­grams). What you need in the linux_base ports are libraries, con­fig and data files which do not exist in FreeBSD or have a dif­fer­ent syn­tax than in FreeBSD (those con­fig or data files which are just in a dif­fer­ent place, can be sym­linked), and basic shell com­mands (which com­mands are needed or not… well… good ques­tion, in the past we made deci­sions what to include based upon prob­lem reports from users). Now for the things which are not avail­able and where not added as a depen­dency. Those are things which are either used dur­ing install, or where use­ful to have in the past. Find out by what it was replaced and have a look if this replace­ment can eas­ily be used instead. If it can be used, add it. If not, well… bad luck, we (the FreeBSD com­mu­nity) will see how to han­dle this somehow.

If you think that you have all you need in BIN_DISTFILES, please update SRC_DISTFILES accord­ingly and gen­er­ate the dis­t­file via  make –DPACKAGE_BUILDING make­sum to have the check­sums of the sources (for legal rea­sons we need them on our mirrors).

The next step is to have a look at REMOVE_DIRS, REMOVE_FILES and ADD_DIRS if some­thing needs to be mod­i­fied. Most of them are there to fall back to the cor­re­spond­ing FreeBSD directories/files, or because they are not needed at all (REMOVE_*). Do not remove direc­to­ries from ADD_DIRS, they are cre­ated here to fix some edge con­di­tions (I do not remem­ber exactly why we had to add them, and I do not take the time ATM to search in the CVS history).

If you are lucky, this is all (make sure the plist is cor­rect). If you are not lucky and you need to make some mod­i­fi­ca­tions to files, have a look at the do-build tar­get in the Make­file, this is the place where some changes are done to cre­ate a nice user experience.

If you arrive here while cre­at­ing a new linux_base port, lean back and feel a bit proud. You man­aged to cre­ate a new linux_base port. It is not very well tested at this moment, and it is far from every­thing which needs to be done to have the com­plete Linux infra­struc­ture for a given Linux release, but the most impor­tant part is done. Please notify freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org and call for testers.

What is missing?

The full Lin­ux­u­la­tor infra­struc­ture for the FreeBSD Ports Col­lec­tion has some more ports around a linux_base port. Most of the infra­struc­ture for this is han­dled in Mk/bsd.linux-apps.mk.

UPDATE: I got some time to write how to update the Linux-infrastructure ports.

GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…
GD Star Rat­ing
load­ing…

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,